Central banks took an enormous leap on the street to direct market intervention in 2020. All developed market central banks added direct purchases of company bonds to their quantitative easing (QE) applications. As of 31 December 2020, the European Central Financial institution (ECB) and the US Federal Reserve held €250 billion and €46 billion in company bonds on their respective stability sheets.
Though these holdings should not as large as complete authorities debt, the best way the Fed carried out this financial coverage intervention was slightly novel. It purchased shut to six% of the full property underneath administration (AUM) in US company bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and outsourced the execution to BlackRock.
It was simply the most recent illustration of how buy-side credit score market contributors have advanced for the reason that international monetary disaster (GFC). During the last decade or so, the buy-side construction has grown extremely concentrated, a lot in order that at the moment the world’s high 5 asset administration companies command greater than 27% of world credit score AUM.
On the identical time, efforts by regulators to discourage extreme risk-taking by monetary intermediaries has restricted the latter’s capability to offer market liquidity. Concurrently, low rates of interest and central financial institution bond shopping for have inflated company bond issuance, making the necessity for liquidity amenities extra necessary than ever.
In consequence, many market contributors have turned to ETFs. Why? As a result of they consider that — as intra-day traded devices invested in lots of index-tracking securities — ETFs can present an alternate supply of liquidity.
Such considering is flawed. Funding in these securities has considerably elevated ETFs’ prominence out there and established a brand new sort of enormous and necessary buy-side investor within the type of the ETF sponsor. However this investor might not have the identical funding aims or incentives as its conventional buy-side counterparts
Company Bond Market Purchase-Facet Construction
For a few years, credit score markets have been notoriously uncovered to issuer focus danger. The Monetary sector in funding grade (IG) and the Power sector in excessive yield (HY) characterize 15% and greater than 20%, respectively, of the danger of every of those markets globally.
However whereas the issuer perspective is crucial for assessing danger, buyers must also think about the buy-side of the market.
The worldwide bond market’s present buy-side construction is tough to explain objectively. Bonds are generally immediately held by non-financial entities or by liability-driven buyers that don’t all the time report all their holdings publicly. For instance, information from the Fed’s Movement of Funds present that funding funds complete near 30% of the company and overseas fixed-income property held by US entities. Insurance coverage firms are the biggest homeowners of those property with a 37.5% share of the full as of 31 December 2020.
This helps clarify why the results of buy-side focus and the results for the company bond market construction have up to now been largely ignored.
To evaluate these traits, we used Bloomberg information to construct an aggregated view of all of the funding companies advising or immediately holding securities included within the ICE-BofA World Company and HY indices. This universe of two,847 funding administration firms covers 33% of the full international IG and 41% of the worldwide HY indices. Our evaluation confirmed a cloth focus on the investor aspect: 45% of IG and 50% of HY markets are held by the highest 10 funding companies.
What explains this heightened focus? The mutual fund universe affords some perception. Mutual funds are essentially the most actively traded buy-side entities and given their higher availability, they permit for extra in-depth evaluation. However company bonds are eligible investments for a lot of different fixed-income methods, so the universe past company bond-focused mutual funds have to be taken into consideration. For the sake of completeness, we’ve got additionally included so-called “Combination” methods in our evaluation, together with company bond-focused ones.
The chart beneath highlights the extent of buy-side focus: The highest three asset administration firms characterize 28% of AUM, whereas 90% of company bond ETF property are managed by solely three firms.
AUM Focus amongst Administration Firms by Fund Kind
Statistics aggregated from 7,606 fixed-income mutual funds centered on fixed-income “Combination” or “Company” bonds methods in arduous currencies (CAD, CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, and USD) with greater than $50 million AUM. Whole AUM for this mutual fund group amounted to $5.4 trillion as of 31 December 2020. The chart above gives two completely different splits of this identical universe: 1. ETFs (largely passive methods as energetic ETFs are a really minor a part of the universe) vs. energetic. 2. Company IG- vs. company HY-focused mutual funds.
Passive Investing’s Position in Bond Markets
No matter one’s perspective on passive investing or the ETF as an funding automobile, this market is at present working in an oligopolistic construction with potential impacts on worth formation, liquidity, and the energetic administration trade as a complete.
Whereas the ETF sector’s share of complete mutual fund trade AUM began to rise earlier than the GFC, it accelerated considerably within the aftermath of the disaster. Although ETFs quantity to 9% of the general funds in our evaluation (together with the so-called mixture methods), greater than 25% of company IG-focused mutual funds are invested via ETFs, as are barely greater than 12% of HY-focused funds.
Share of Passive Funds (ETFs) in Mounted-Earnings Mutual Fund Universes by Technique
Statistics aggregated from 7,606 fixed-income mutual funds centered on fixed-income “Combination” or “Company” bonds methods in arduous currencies (CAD, CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, and USD) with greater than $50m AUM. Whole AUM for this mutual fund group amounted to $5.4 trillion as of 31 December 2020.
The rise of ETF investing within the company bond market is essentially pushed by the ETF’s capability to effectively replicate broad indices in addition to its exchange-traded function. The latter high quality alleviates problems with worth transparency and makes the safety accessible to a broad set of buyers.
For the reason that GFC and the following regulatory restrictions positioned on monetary establishments, ETFs have turn out to be the primary liquid devices obtainable to numerous buyers for managing credit score publicity. The ETF’s share of flows into or out of the asset class are much more spectacular: ETFs accounted for nearly 50% of inflows into IG company funds and 30% into HY during the last three to 5 years.
ETF Share of USD Mounted-Earnings Fund Inflows
Statistics aggregated from 7,606 fixed-income funds centered on fixed-income “Combination” or “Company” bonds methods in arduous currencies (CAD, CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, and USD) with greater than $50 million AUM. Whole AUM for this fund group amounted to $5.4 trillion as of 31 December 2020. Flows are computed on a month-to-month foundation first and ETF circulate shares on a quarterly foundation.
The Fed’s resolution to incorporate these devices in its pandemic-related QE applications acknowledges this actuality: The liquidity of company bonds depends upon ETF buying and selling situations.
But evaluation of the US ETF fairness and fixed-income universes reveals this premise just isn’t wholly correct. Aside from essentially the most liquid decile of Treasuries funds, fixed-income ETFs seem two- to five-times much less liquid than their fairness counterparts. This helps additional clarify the necessity for the Fed’s intervention within the company bond market in 2020.
Most Low cost to NAV for US-Listed ETFs, Common by Deciles, December 2019 to December 2020
Universe of energetic fairness and fixed-income ETFs with AUM above $1 billion as of 31 December 2020
Excessive market environments, reminiscent of that of the March 2020 disaster, remind us that whereas ETFs are exchange-traded devices, that alone doesn’t assure that the underlying securities are resistant to liquidity stress. On the contrary: The excessive focus amongst ETF suppliers — amongst ETF replication algorithms — tends to additionally focus buying and selling stress on particular bonds. These commerce extra typically and incur extra volatility in addition to greater price of liquidity when ETFs come underneath promoting stress.
After all, ETF automobiles should not with out prices for buyers. Essentially the most neglected amongst these are these associated to ETF bonds’ basic premium together with the issuer danger concentrations inherent in underlying debt-weighted company bond indices. For these causes, company bond ETFs don’t acquire the total market danger premium over the long term.
Given this context, the oligopolistic market construction that has fashioned because of the affect of ETFs must be acknowledged.
Within the second a part of our evaluation, we’ll lay out the implications this has for buyers looking for to generate alpha from fixed-income markets and thus for portfolio building itself.
In case you preferred this put up, don’t neglect to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the writer. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.
Picture credit score: ©Getty Photographs / halans
Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can file credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.
