As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face rising complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in belongings (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement belongings, DC plans carry important accountability for making certain sturdy monetary outcomes for individuals1. In 2025, plan sponsors should concentrate on optimizing funding methods, decreasing prices, and enhancing participant training to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody important areas equivalent to goal date fund choice, price transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation developments.
Concentrating on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines finest practices for TDF choice2. Key takeaways embody:
- Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic evaluation
- Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
- Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
- Benefiting from all accessible info within the evaluation and decision-making course of
- Documenting the method
- Creating efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to think about. First, as with every funding course of, you will need to perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of workers make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by amassing workforce demographics, funding behavioral developments — generally present in reviews produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce information. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s targets for the plan and general funding beliefs that may function a information when evaluating varied TDFs. Making prudent funding selections requires these parts to drive the evaluation and establish TDFs which might be appropriate on your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Lessons
We regularly see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by way of the trouble of discovering an incredible funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding car.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor may choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio consists of revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, fairly than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different instances, a plan could be eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) car with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Usually, these selections or oversights end in plan individuals paying increased funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding car.
We recommend plan sponsors contemplate the affect on individuals of their present mutual fund share courses, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for identical CIT technique. We advocate plan sponsors use zero-revenue share courses of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply higher price transparency and sometimes decrease general charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share courses.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding opinions comply with an identical format: a have a look at the economic system and capital markets adopted by a evaluation of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of substitute, adjustments are mentioned. Whereas routine opinions of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we recommend supplementing with a periodic evaluation of the funding lineup construction, that means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re applied with energetic administration or passive administration. We recommend the sort of evaluation not less than each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant manner.
Determine 1: Normal Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To judge the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is suitable or whether or not funding classes ought to be altered. Elements for the dialogue may embody participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Schooling Sources
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Examine, workers reported spending not less than three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that staff’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
Now we have seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages might help workers enhance their monetary well being and scale back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a big function — significantly for workforces the place a big proportion of the inhabitants is just not at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their workers on the lookout for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These personal conferences allow workers to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Inspecting Committee Construction and Duties
Employment developments from “the nice resignation” to “the large keep” and “the nice reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of immediately’s workforce. These adjustments additionally negatively affect an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes may range from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
- Doc the committee construction and tasks
- Construct an onboarding training guidelines for brand new committee members
- Preserve a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with training
- Affirm the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, govt summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Tendencies in Litigation and Regulation
With important provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there’s the potential for brand new tax laws. Modifications to tax-advantaged retirement packages can include tax laws, so will probably be necessary for plan sponsors to remain present on potential adjustments.
From a litigation standpoint, two main developments formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture belongings.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary obligation to watch plan bills in order that they’re cheap for the companies supplied? You will need to be aware that this matter covers each vendor bills, equivalent to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, equivalent to alternative of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture belongings is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has centered on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture belongings to cut back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on high of those and different developments in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal function in shaping the monetary way forward for tens of millions of workers. By prioritizing funding optimization, value effectivity, governance, and participant training, they will improve retirement outcomes and scale back fiduciary dangers. As market situations, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making might be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant affect in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric offered herein is of a basic nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any individual, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such info is just not assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to vary with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising and marketing title PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated companies supplied by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions carried out by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation except, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax companies settlement. PNC Financial institution is just not registered as a municipal advisor below the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Client Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
