Technology Mining Restricted (TSX: GENM; OTCQB: GENMF) (“Gen Mining” or the “Firm”) is happy to announce constructive outcomes on the up to date Feasibility Research (“2025 FS” or the “Feasibility Research”) for the Marathon Copper-Palladium Mission (the “Mission”) situated close to the City of Marathon in Northwestern Ontario. All greenback quantities are in Canadian {dollars} (“$” or “C$”) except in any other case said. All references to “Mlbs” are to hundreds of thousands of kilos and “Moz” are to hundreds of thousands of troy ounces and “koz” are to hundreds of troy ounces.
Highlights:
- Sturdy Base Case economics1: An after-tax NPV6% of $1.07 billion, IRR of 28% and 1.9 yr payback interval primarily based on the 3-yr trailing common metallic costs on the efficient date2
- Robust crucial mineral manufacturing throughout pre-production and the primary three years of economic operation: 151 Mlbs of payable copper, 720 koz of payable palladium and 156 koz of platinum
- Preliminary Capital: C$992 million3
- Engaging AISC:Lifetime of mine (“LOM”) all-in sustaining prices (“AISC”) of US$2.05/CuEq lb or US$781/PdEq ounces
- At latest long-term consensus costs2: An after-tax NPV6% of $876 million, IRR of 24% and a couple of.2 yr payback interval, with 41% of payable metallic revenues attributable to copper and 41% attributable to palladium
- At latest spot costs2: An after-tax NPV6% of $749 million, IRR of 21% and a couple of.4 yr payback interval, with 44% of payable metallic revenues attributable to copper and 37% attributable to palladium.
- Common annual payable metals: 42 Mlbs copper,168 koz palladium, 38 koz platinum, 12 koz gold and 240 koz silver over roughly 13 years of mine life
- Jobs: Creation of over 800 jobs throughout building and over 400 direct everlasting jobs throughout operations
- The Subsequent Essential Mineral, Shovel-Prepared Mission: Absolutely Permitted for Development federally and ready for approval on final allow from the Authorities of Ontario.
The 2025 FS incorporates the outcomes of the Mission optimization work reported by the Firm in a information launch entitled “Technology Completes Optimization Work for the Marathon Mission with Improved Mine Plan and Lowered Capex” issued on November 20, 2024, which centered on two key points: 1) optimization of the mine plan to maximise metallic manufacturing and defer waste stripping within the early years of operations in an effort to enhance early money flows and scale back the payback interval (“Mine Plan Optimization”); and a couple of) optimization of the method plant design and format, together with sizing of key tools, plant footprint and foundations, in an effort to scale back the preliminary Mission capital prices (“Preliminary Capital Optimization”, and along with the Mine Plan Optimization, the “Optimization Work”).
The Optimization Work has now been additional up to date to include modifications to Mineral Sources, Mineral Reserves, the Life-of-Mine (LOM) mining plan and working and capital prices, utilizing the identical metallic value assumptions which shaped the premise of the November 20, 2024 information launch.
The 2025 FS was ready by Ausenco Engineering Canada ULC (“Ausenco”), together with contributions from Moose Mountain Technical Providers (“MMTS”), Knight Piésold Ltd. (“KP”), P&E Mining Consultants Inc. (“P&E”), and JDS Power and Mining, Inc (“JDS”).
The 2025 FS outlines the operation of an open pit mine and course of plant over a mine lifetime of 12.5 years and replaces the Firm’s earlier feasibility research entitled “Amended Feasibility Research Replace, Marathon Palladium & Copper Mission, Ontario, Canada” dated Could 31, 2024.
Jamie Levy, President and CEO of the Firm, commented, “The up to date Feasibility Research for the Marathon Copper-Palladium Mission clearly underscores its potential to be Ontario’s subsequent producing crucial mineral mine. The mission not solely advantages from a robust commodity mixture of crucial metals but additionally stands as a strategic Canadian response to rising threats within the world mineral provide chain.
The Marathon Mission’s vital publicity to copper and palladium positions it as a uniquely enticing alternative within the crucial mineral area in North America. With copper going through long-term provide constraints and protracted provide dangers from the first palladium producers in Russia and South Africa, the Marathon Mission is properly positioned to assist North American and European smelters. The Mission’s superior improvement and allowing can be a key differentiator, which positions us to convey metallic to market sooner than every other North American copper mission not but in building.”
Kerry Knoll, Government Chairman of the Firm commented, “Anticipating the ultimate allow approvals from the provincial authorities within the close to future, the Marathon Mission is on observe to develop into the subsequent main shovel-ready crucial metallic mission in Ontario and Canada. The potential backing from provincial and nationwide crucial metallic funds, mixed with assist from banks, personal fairness, institutional buyers, and retail shareholders, offers a robust basis for securing full financing within the close to time period.”
Financial Evaluation
The up to date Feasibility Research underscores the continued financial robustness of the Marathon Mission with an after-tax NPV6% of $1.07 billion, IRR of 28% and 1.9 yr payback interval primarily based on the 3-yr trailing common metallic costs as of November 1, 2024.
The next desk presents the important thing outputs of the financial evaluation for the 2025 FS utilizing 3-year trailing common metallic costs, along with the identical evaluation carried out utilizing spot and consensus metallic costs, and overseas trade fee assumptions:
| Merchandise |
Items |
2025 FS(c) |
March 25, 2025 Spot(d) |
March 2025 long-term consensus(e) |
| Key Assumptions | ||||
| Change fee (C$/US$) |
C$/US$ |
1.35 |
1.44 |
1.37 |
| Palladium Value |
US$/oz |
1,525 |
965 |
1,133 |
| Copper Value |
US$/lb |
4.00 |
4.43 |
4.52 |
| Platinum Value |
US$/oz |
950 |
1,003 |
1,240 |
| Gold Value |
US$/oz |
2,000 |
2,983 |
2,511 |
| Silver Value |
US$/oz |
24.00 |
33.68 |
31.19 |
| Income Cut up (a) | ||||
| Palladium |
% |
52 |
37 |
41 |
| Copper |
% |
34 |
44 |
41 |
| Platinum |
% |
7 |
9 |
10 |
| Gold |
% |
5 |
9 |
7 |
| Silver |
% |
1 |
2 |
2 |
| Financial Outcomes (b)(f) | ||||
| Pre-Tax Money Stream (undiscounted) |
$M |
3,009 |
2,291 |
2,576 |
| Pre-Tax NPV6% |
$M |
1,660 |
1,189 |
1,375 |
| Pre-Tax IRR |
% |
1.7 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
| Pre-Tax Payback |
years |
35.1% |
27.6% |
30.6% |
| After-Tax Money Stream (undiscounted) |
$M |
2,032 |
1,554 |
1,744 |
| After-Tax NPV6% |
$M |
1,070 |
749 |
876 |
| After-Tax IRR |
% |
1.9 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
| After-Tax Payback |
years |
27.6% |
21.4% |
23.8% |
| Notes: | ||||
| (a) Totals might not add to 100% because of rounding. Splits introduced earlier than changes for the impression of the Treasured Metals Buy Settlement (“PMPA”) with Wheaton Treasured Metals Corp. (“Wheaton”). | ||||
|
(b) The financial evaluation was carried out in actual phrases (i.e., with out inflation components) in This autumn 2024 Canadian {dollars}, assuming no mission building financing however inclusive of mining tools leasing. |
||||
|
(c) Steel value assumptions are primarily based on the adjusted 3-year historic trailing averages as of November 1, 2024 for every of the metals. The three-year averages are as follows: Palladium – US$1,523/oz, Copper at U$4.02/lb, Platinum at US$964/oz, Gold at US$1,995/ouncesand Silver at US$24.02/oz. |
||||
|
(d) March 25, 2025 spot costs of US$965/ouncespalladium, US$4.58/lb copper US$981/ouncesplatinum, US$3,020/ouncesgold, US$33.68/ouncessilver and trade fee of C$1.43 : US$1.00, supply: Bloomberg |
||||
|
(e) Lengthy-term consensus pricing offered by Haywood Securities as of March 24, 2025. |
||||
|
(f) See Non-IFRS Monetary Measures, under, for extra info on Pre-Tax and After-Tax Money Flows. |
Sensitivities
The Mission has vital leverage to palladium and copper costs. The after-tax valuation sensitivities for the important thing metrics are proven under.
|
After-Tax NPV6% Outcomes |
Palladium Value Sensitivity (US$/oz) |
||||||||
|
800 |
1,000 |
1,250 |
1,500 |
1,525 |
1,750 |
2,000 |
2,200 |
||
|
Copper Value Sensitivity (US$/lb) |
2.50 |
(291) |
(9) |
308 |
612 |
643 |
916 |
1,214 |
1,466 |
|
3.00 |
(120) |
145 |
452 |
758 |
788 |
1,057 |
1,368 |
1,606 |
|
|
3.50 |
41 |
296 |
598 |
899 |
929 |
1,211 |
1,509 |
1,746 |
|
|
4.00 |
194 |
438 |
741 |
1,040 |
1,070 |
1,352 |
1,649 |
1,886 |
|
|
4.50 |
337 |
582 |
883 |
1,195 |
1,225 |
1,492 |
1,788 |
2,023 |
|
|
5.00 |
484 |
723 |
1,023 |
1,335 |
1,365 |
1,632 |
1,927 |
2,165 |
|
|
5.50 |
625 |
866 |
1,178 |
1,475 |
1,505 |
1,771 |
2,067 |
2,306 |
|
After-Tax IRR Outcomes |
Palladium Value Sensitivity (US$/oz) |
||||||||
|
800 |
1,000 |
1,250 |
1,500 |
1,525 |
1,750 |
2,000 |
2,200 |
||
|
Copper Value Sensitivity (US$/lb) |
2.50 |
– |
5.7% |
13.5% |
19.9% |
20.5% |
25.5% |
30.7% |
34.5% |
|
3.00 |
2.8% |
9.6% |
16.4% |
22.4% |
23.0% |
27.8% |
32.7% |
36.4% |
|
|
3.50 |
7.0% |
12.9% |
19.2% |
24.8% |
25.4% |
30.0% |
34.7% |
38.3% |
|
|
4.00 |
10.5% |
15.8% |
21.7% |
27.1% |
27.6% |
32.1% |
36.6% |
40.1% |
|
|
4.50 |
13.6% |
18.5% |
24.1% |
29.3% |
29.8% |
34.1% |
38.5% |
41.9% |
|
|
5.00 |
16.4% |
21.0% |
26.4% |
31.4% |
31.9% |
36.0% |
40.3% |
43.6% |
|
|
5.50 |
19.0% |
23.5% |
28.6% |
33.4% |
33.8% |
37.8% |
42.1% |
45.3% |
|
After-Tax Payback |
Palladium Value Sensitivity (US$/oz) |
||||||||
|
800 |
1,000 |
1,250 |
1,500 |
1,525 |
1,750 |
2,000 |
2,200 |
||
|
Copper Value Sensitivity (US$/lb) |
2.50 |
– |
7.8 |
4.3 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
1.5 |
|
3.00 |
10.4 |
5.6 |
3.3 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
1.9 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
|
|
3.50 |
6.8 |
4.9 |
2.9 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
|
|
4.00 |
5.6 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
|
|
4.50 |
5.0 |
3.0 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
|
|
5.00 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
|
|
5.50 |
3.0 |
2.2 |
1.9 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
|
After-Tax Outcomes |
OPEX Sensitivity |
||||
|
+30% |
+15% |
0% |
-15% |
-30% |
|
|
NPV6% ($M) |
669 |
871 |
1,070 |
1,282 |
1,479 |
|
Payback (yrs) |
2.3 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
|
IRR (%) |
21.2% |
24.6% |
27.6% |
30.5% |
33.1% |
|
After-Tax Outcomes |
CAPEX Sensitivity |
||||
|
+30% |
+15% |
0% |
-15% |
-30% |
|
|
NPV6% ($M) |
860 |
966 |
1,070 |
1,173 |
1,277 |
|
Payback (yrs) |
3.0 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
|
IRR (%) |
19.6% |
23.1% |
27.6% |
33.8% |
42.7% |
|
After-Tax Outcomes |
FX Sensitivity |
||||
|
1.25 |
1.30 |
1.35 |
1.40 |
1.45 |
|
|
NPV6% ($M) |
840 |
955 |
1,070 |
1,199 |
1,313 |
|
Payback (yrs) |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
|
IRR (%) |
23.7% |
25.7% |
27.6% |
29.5% |
31.3% |
Capital Prices
The preliminary capital prices for building and ramp-up, along with anticipated sustaining capital and closure prices, are introduced within the desk under:
|
Capital Space |
2025 FS ($M) |
|
Cell Tools for Development(a) |
74 |
|
Processing Plant |
280 |
|
Infrastructure |
88 |
|
TSF, Water Administration and Earthworks |
97 |
|
EPCM, Basic and Homeowners Value |
198 |
|
Preproduction, Startup, Commissioning |
169 |
|
Contingency |
87 |
|
Preliminary Capital |
992 |
|
Preproduction income(b) |
(184) |
|
Whole |
809 |
|
Sustaining Capital |
565 |
|
Closure and Reclamation Prices |
72 |
|
Notes: |
|
| (a) Cell tools acquired for Development is introduced as the price of tools deposits and lease funds throughout the building and pre-production interval. The rest of the tools leasing prices are incurred throughout operations and included in sustaining capital. | |
| (b) Income internet of Associated Off-Web site Prices (Transport, Smelter, and Royalties) and dealing capital changes. See Financial Evaluation, above, for extra info on the metallic value assumptions used within the 2025 FS. |
Working Prices
The Mission working prices have been up to date and are mirrored within the desk under.
|
Description |
Items |
Working Value |
|
Mining(a) |
$/t processed |
12.93 |
|
Processing |
$/t processed |
8.57 |
|
Basic & Administration |
$/t processed |
2.62 |
|
Focus Transport Prices |
$/t processed |
1.96 |
|
Remedy & Refining Prices |
$/t processed |
2.38 |
|
Royalties |
$/t processed |
0.10 |
|
Whole Working Prices |
$/t processed |
28.56 |
|
Common Working Value |
US$/ouncesPdEq(c) |
663 |
|
Common All-in Sustaining Value (b) |
US$/ouncesPdEq(c) |
781 |
|
Common Working Value |
US$/lb CuEq(c) |
1.74 |
|
Common All-in Sustaining Value (b) |
US$/lb CuEq(c) |
2.05 |
|
Notes: |
||
| (a) Mining value per tonne mined is C$3.49/t . | ||
| (b) All-in sustaining value excludes the impression of the Wheaton PMPA. | ||
| (c) See Non-IFRS Monetary Measures, under, for extra info on Working Prices, AISC, PdEq and CuEq. |
Mine Plan
The lifetime of mine plan has been up to date and the manufacturing particulars are summarized within the desk under.
|
Items |
2025 TR |
|
|
LOM Throughput |
||
|
Peak Course of Plant Throughput |
tpd |
27,700 |
|
Mt/yr |
10.1 |
|
|
Peak Mining Fee |
tpd |
164,000 |
|
Mt/yr |
60 |
|
|
Mine Manufacturing (LOM) |
||
|
Whole Mined |
Mt |
489.7 |
|
Whole Waste Mined |
Mt |
361.4 |
|
Whole Ore Mined |
Mt |
128.3 |
|
Strip Ratio |
waste:ore |
2.8 |
|
Payable Steel (LOM) |
||
|
Palladium |
koz |
2,161 |
|
Copper |
Mlbs |
532 |
|
Platinum |
koz |
488 |
|
Gold |
koz |
160 |
|
Silver |
koz |
3,051 |
Mineral Sources
The Mineral Useful resource Estimate under is for the mixed Marathon, Geordie and Sally Deposits. The Mineral Useful resource Estimates for Marathon, Geordie and Sally had been ready by P&E.
Pit Constrained Mixed Mineral Useful resource Estimate for the Marathon, Geordie and Sally Deposits (Efficient date November 1, 2024)
|
Mineral Useful resource Classification |
Tonnes |
Pd |
Cu |
Pt |
Au |
Ag |
|||||
|
Mt |
g/t |
koz |
% |
Mlbs |
g/t |
koz |
g/t |
koz |
g/t |
koz |
|
|
Marathon Deposit |
|||||||||||
|
Measured |
164.0 |
0.56 |
2,973 |
0.20 |
712 |
0.18 |
970 |
0.07 |
358 |
1.7 |
9,089 |
|
Indicated |
38.1 |
0.39 |
476 |
0.18 |
153 |
0.13 |
159 |
0.06 |
71 |
1.6 |
1,896 |
|
Meas. + Ind. |
202.0 |
0.53 |
3,449 |
0.19 |
865 |
0.17 |
1,129 |
0.07 |
429 |
1.7 |
10,985 |
|
Inferred |
2.9 |
0.36 |
34 |
0.16 |
10 |
0.13 |
12 |
0.06 |
6 |
1.2 |
112 |
|
Geordie Deposit |
|||||||||||
|
Indicated |
17.3 |
0.56 |
312 |
0.35 |
133 |
0.04 |
20 |
0.05 |
25 |
2.4 |
1,351 |
|
Inferred |
12.9 |
0.51 |
212 |
0.28 |
80 |
0.03 |
12 |
0.03 |
14 |
2.4 |
982 |
|
Sally Deposit |
|||||||||||
|
Indicated |
24.8 |
0.35 |
278 |
0.17 |
93 |
0.2 |
160 |
0.07 |
56 |
0.7 |
567 |
|
Inferred |
14.0 |
0.28 |
124 |
0.19 |
57 |
0.15 |
70 |
0.05 |
24 |
0.6 |
280 |
|
Whole Mission |
|||||||||||
|
Measured |
164.0 |
0.56 |
2,973 |
0.20 |
712 |
0.18 |
970 |
0.07 |
358 |
1.7 |
9,089 |
|
Indicated |
80.1 |
0.41 |
1,066 |
0.21 |
379 |
0.13 |
339 |
0.06 |
152 |
1.5 |
3,814 |
|
Meas. + Ind. |
244.1 |
0.51 |
4,039 |
0.20 |
1,091 |
0.17 |
1,309 |
0.06 |
510 |
1.6 |
12,903 |
|
Inferred |
29.8 |
0.39 |
370 |
0.22 |
147 |
0.10 |
94 |
0.05 |
44 |
1.4 |
1,374 |
| Notes: | |||||||||||
| a. Mineral Sources had been estimated utilizing the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Requirements on Mineral Sources and Reserves, Definitions (2014) and Finest Practices Tips (2019) ready by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council. | |||||||||||
| b. Mineral Sources that aren’t Mineral Reserves don’t have demonstrated financial viability. The estimate of Mineral Sources could also be materially affected by environmental, allowing, authorized, advertising, or different related points. Mineral Sources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves. | |||||||||||
| c. The Inferred Mineral Useful resource on this estimate has a decrease stage of confidence than that utilized to an Indicated Mineral Useful resource and should not be transformed to a Mineral Reserve. It’s moderately anticipated that almost all of the Inferred Mineral Useful resource might be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Useful resource with continued exploration. | |||||||||||
| d. The Marathon Mineral Useful resource is reported inside a constrained pit shell at a NSR cut-off worth of $13.6/t. | |||||||||||
| e. Marathon NSR ($/t) = (Cu % x 111.49) + (Ag g/t x 0.73) + (Au g/t x 80.18) + (Pd g/t x 56.02) +(Pt g/t x 36.49) – 2.66 | |||||||||||
| f. The Marathon Mineral Useful resource Estimate was primarily based on metallic costs of US$1,550/ouncesPd, US$4.250/lb Cu, US$1,100/ouncesPt, US$2,300/ouncesAu and US$27/ouncesAg, and a C$:US$ trade fee of C$1.35 to US$1.00. | |||||||||||
| g. The Sally and Geordie mineral sources are reported inside a constraining pit shell at a NSR cut-off worth of $13/t. | |||||||||||
| h. Sally and Geordie NSR ($/t) = (Ag g/t x 0.48) + (Au g/t x 42.14) + (Cu % x 73.27) + (Pd g/t x 50.50) + (Pt g/t x 25.07) – 2.62 | |||||||||||
| i. The Sally and Geordie Mineral Useful resource Estimate was primarily based on metallic costs of US$1,600/ouncesPd, US$3.00/lb Cu, US$900/ouncesPt, US$1,500/ouncesAu and US$18/ouncesAg, and a C$:US$ trade fee of 1.30 C$ to 1.00 US$. | |||||||||||
| j. Contained metallic totals might differ because of rounding. |
Mineral Reserves
The Mineral Reserve estimate for the Mission contains solely the Marathon Deposit. The Mineral Reserve Estimate was ready by MMTS.
Marathon Mission Open Pit Mineral Reserve Estimates
(Efficient Date of November 1, 2024)
|
Mineral Reserves |
Tonnes |
Pd |
Cu |
Pt |
Au |
Ag |
|||||
|
Mt |
g/t |
koz |
% |
M lb |
g/t |
koz |
g/t |
koz |
g/t |
koz |
|
|
Confirmed |
115.5 |
0.66 |
2,434 |
0.22 |
549 |
0.20 |
754 |
0.07 |
264 |
1.7 |
6,242 |
|
Possible |
12.7 |
0.47 |
193 |
0.20 |
56 |
0.15 |
61 |
0.06 |
26 |
1.6 |
635 |
|
P & P |
128.3 |
0.64 |
2,627 |
0.21 |
605 |
0.20 |
815 |
0.07 |
291 |
1.8 |
6,877 |
|
Notes: |
|||||||||||
| a. The mineral reserves estimate had been ready by Marc Schulte, P.Eng., who can be an unbiased Certified Individual, reported utilizing the 2014 CIM Definition Requirements, and have an efficient date of November 1, 2024. | |||||||||||
| b. Mineral reserves are a subset of the Measured and Indicated Mineral Sources Estimate that has an efficient date of November 1, 2024. Inferred class Mineral Sources are handled as waste. | |||||||||||
| c. Mineral Reserves are primarily based on the 2024 Marathon Mission Feasibility Research Replace mine plan. | |||||||||||
| d. Mineral Reserves are mined tonnes and grade; the reference level is the method plant feed on the main crusher. Course of Plant feed tonnes and grade embrace consideration of mining operational dilution and restoration. | |||||||||||
| e. Mineral Reserves are reported at a cutoff grade of $16/t NSR. The NSR cut-off assumes Pd Value of US$1,525/oz, Cu value of US$4.00/lb, Pt Value of US$950/oz, Au value of US$2,000/oz, Ag value of US$24/oz, at an trade fee of 0.74 US greenback per 1.00 Canadian greenback; payable percentages of 95% for Pd, 96.5% for Cu, 93% for Pt, 93.5% for Au, 93.5% for Ag; refining costs of US$24.5/ouncesfor Pd, US$0.079/lb for Cu, US$24.5/ouncesfor Pt, US$0.50/ouncesfor Ag; minimal deductions of two.875 g/t for Pd, 1.1% for Cu, 2.875 g/t for Pt, 1.0 g/t for Au, 30.0 g/t for Ag; therapy costs of US$79/t and transport and off-site prices of US$125/t concentrates, focus ratio of 90.9%; metallurgical recoveries are primarily based on variable grade dependent metallurgical restoration curves. | |||||||||||
| f. The NSR reduce off-value covers course of prices of $8.27/t, normal and administrative (G&A) prices of $2.63/t, sustaining and closure prices of $3.13/t, ore mining differential prices of $0.57/t, and stockpile rehandle prices of $1.40/t. | |||||||||||
| g. Numbers have been rounded, which can end in summation variations. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Definition Requirements for Mineral Sources and Mineral Reserves (CIM (2014) definitions) had been used for Mineral Reserve classification. |
Certified Individuals
The information launch has been reviewed and authorised by Daniel Janusauskas, P.Eng., Technical Providers Supervisor of Technology PGM Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Firm, and a Certified Individual as outlined by Canadian Securities Directors Nationwide Instrument 43-101 Requirements of Disclosure for Mineral Initiatives.
The 2025 FS was ready by means of the collaboration of the next consulting companies and Certified Individuals, every of whom has reviewed and authorised the technical info on this information launch which was inside their main space of duty:
|
Marketing consultant Firm |
Main Space of Accountability |
Certified Individuals |
|
Ausenco Engineering Canada ULC |
General integration, capital value estimation compilation, course of plant capital and working prices, financial evaluation, restoration strategies, mineral processing and metallurgical testwork |
Tommaso Roberto Raponi, P. Eng. |
|
JDS Power and Mining, Inc. |
Infrastructure, and earthworks capital value estimates, and mission execution plan |
Jean-Francois Maille, P.Eng. |
|
Knight Piésold Ltd. |
Tailings Storage Facility, water steadiness, geotechnical research (mine rock storage piles, open pit and native infrastructure and foundations) |
Craig N. Corridor, P.Eng. |
|
Moose Mountain Technical Providers |
Mineral Reserves, mining strategies, mining working and capital value estimate |
Marc Schulte, P. Eng. |
|
P&E Mining Consultants, Inc. |
Property description and placement, accessibility, historical past, geological setting and mineralization, deposit varieties, exploration, drilling, pattern preparation and safety, knowledge verification, Mineral Useful resource Estimates and adjoining properties |
Eugene J. Puritch, P.Eng., FEC, CET Jarita Barry, P.Geo. Fred H. Brown, P.Geo. David Burga, P.Geo. William Stone, PhD, P.Geo. |
NI 43-101 Technical Report
The 2025 FS was ready in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Definition Requirements for Mineral Sources and Mineral Reserves adopted Could 19, 2014, and in accordance with Nationwide Instrument 43-101 – Requirements of Disclosure for Mineral Initiatives. Gen Mining intends to file the 2025 FS referenced on this information launch as an NI 43-101 Technical Report on or earlier than March 31, 2025. Readers are inspired to learn this Technical Report in its entirety, together with all {qualifications}, assumptions and exclusions that relate to the main points summarized on this information launch. The Technical Report is meant to be learn as a complete, and sections shouldn’t be learn or relied upon out of context.
In regards to the Firm
Gen Mining’s focus is the event of the Marathon Mission, a big undeveloped copper-palladium deposit in Northwestern Ontario. The Marathon Property covers a land package deal of roughly 22,000 hectares, or 220 sq. kilometers. Gen Mining is devoted to fostering a greener future by selling sustainability, empowering communities, and delivering worth to our stakeholders.
About Ausenco
Ausenco is a world firm redefining what’s doable. The staff relies out of 21 workplaces working throughout 5 continents to ship companies worldwide. Combining deep technical experience with a 30-year observe document, Ausenco delivers revolutionary, value-add consulting, research, mission supply, asset operations and upkeep options to the minerals and metals and industrial sectors (www.ausenco.com).
Non-IFRS Monetary Measures and Different Measures
The Firm has included sure monetary measures on this information launch, together with preliminary capital value, working prices, AISC, and Pre-Tax and After-Tax Money Flows, which aren’t measures acknowledged beneath IFRS and don’t have a standardized which means. These non-IFRS monetary measures are included on this doc as a result of these statistics are measures that administration will use to observe future monetary efficiency, and to plan and assess the general effectiveness and effectivity of future mining operations. The Firm doesn’t have historic non-IFRS monetary measures nor historic comparable measures beneath IFRS, and due to this fact the foregoing potential non-IFRS monetary measures might not be reconciled to the closest comparable measures beneath IFRS. Non-IFRS measures don’t have any standardized which means prescribed beneath IFRS, and due to this fact, they might not be similar to related measures employed by different corporations. The information introduced is meant to supply further info and shouldn’t be thought-about in isolation or as an alternative choice to measures ready in accordance with IFRS.
Non-IFRS efficiency measures used herein are outlined as follows:
- Preliminary Capital contains all prices incurred from the efficient date of the 2025 FS (excluding historic sunk prices) till the purpose the place industrial manufacturing is achieved, together with bills associated to engineering, tools buy and set up, course of plant and mine infrastructure building, and every other prices related to placing the Mission into operations.
- Working Prices contains mining, processing, normal and administrative and different, focus transportation prices, therapy and refining costs, and royalties. Prices associated to the Wheaton PMPA are excluded.
- AISC contains Working Prices, closure and reclamation prices, and sustaining capital.
- Pre-tax Money Stream contains whole income much less Working Prices, working capital changes, tools financing, preliminary capital, sustaining capital, closure prices. Prices associated to the Wheaton PMPA are included.
- After-tax Money Stream contains Pre-tax Money Stream much less earnings taxes payable.
The Marathon Mission is a polymetallic deposit. For functions of estimating the Firm’s anticipated prices and future monetary efficiency, the Firm discloses sure monetary measures herein primarily based on estimates of future palladium equal (“PdEq”) and copper equal (“CuEq”) metallic manufacturing. The Firm’s estimated PdEq and CuEq are calculated utilizing the payable metals estimates derived from the Firm’s LOM, as follows:
- Palladium Equal ounces makes use of the formulation PdEq oz = Pd oz + (Cu lb x 4.00 US$/lb + Pt ouncesx US$950/oz + Au ouncesx US$2000/oz + Ag ouncesx US$24.00/oz) / US$1525 Pd/oz.
- Copper Equal kilos makes use of the formulation CuEq lbs = Cu lbs + (Pd ouncesx US$1,525/oz + Pt ouncesx US$950/oz + Au ouncesx US$2000/oz + Ag ouncesx US$24.00/oz) / US$4.00 Cu/lb.
Info Regarding Estimates of Mineral Reserves and Sources
The Mineral Reserve and Mineral Useful resource Estimates on this press launch have been disclosed in accordance with NI 43-101, which differs from the necessities of the U.S. Securities and Change Fee (the “SEC”), and knowledge with respect to mineralization and Mineral Reserves and Mineral Sources contained herein might not be similar to related info disclosed by U.S. corporations.
The SEC has adopted amendments to its disclosure guidelines to modernize the mineral property disclosure necessities beneath the U.S. Securities Change Act of 1934, as amended (the “Change Act”). These amendments turned efficient February 25, 2019 (the “SEC Modernization Guidelines”) with compliance required for the primary fiscal yr starting on or after January 1, 2021. Beneath the SEC Modernization Guidelines, the historic property disclosure necessities for mining registrants included in Trade Information 7 beneath the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, shall be rescinded and changed with disclosure necessities in subpart 1300 of SEC Regulation S-Ok. On account of the adoption of the SEC Modernization Guidelines, the SEC now acknowledges estimates of “Measured Mineral Sources”, “Indicated Mineral Sources” and “Inferred Mineral Sources.” As well as, the SEC has amended its definitions of “Confirmed Mineral Reserves” and “Possible Mineral Reserves” to be “considerably related” to the corresponding requirements beneath NI 43-101. Whereas the SEC will now acknowledge “Measured Mineral Sources”, “Indicated Mineral Sources” and “Inferred Mineral Sources”, U.S. buyers mustn’t assume that any half or all the mineralization in these classes will ever be transformed into a better class of Mineral Sources or into Mineral Reserves. Mineralization described utilizing these phrases has a higher quantity of uncertainty as to its existence and feasibility than mineralization that has been characterised as reserves. Accordingly, U.S. buyers are cautioned to not assume that any Measured Mineral Sources, Indicated Mineral Sources, or Inferred Mineral Sources that the Firm studies are or shall be economically or legally mineable. Additional, “Inferred Mineral Sources” have a higher quantity of uncertainty as to their existence and as as to whether they are often mined legally or economically. Subsequently, U.S. buyers are additionally cautioned to not assume that each one or any a part of the “Inferred Mineral Sources” exist. There isn’t any assurance that any Mineral Reserves or Mineral Sources that the Firm might report as “Confirmed Mineral Reserves”, “Possible Mineral Reserves”, “Measured Mineral Sources”, “Indicated Mineral Sources” and “Inferred Mineral Sources” beneath NI 43-101 could be the identical had the Firm ready the Reserve or Useful resource Estimates beneath the requirements adopted beneath the SEC Modernization Guidelines.
Mineral Sources will not be Mineral Reserves, and don’t have demonstrated financial viability, however do have cheap prospects for financial extraction. Measured and Indicated Mineral Sources are sufficiently properly outlined to permit geological and grade continuity to be moderately assumed and allow the appliance of technical and financial parameters in assessing the financial viability of the Mineral Useful resource. Inferred Mineral Sources are estimated on restricted info not ample to confirm geological and grade continuity or to permit technical and financial parameters to be utilized. Inferred Mineral Sources are too speculative geologically to have financial issues utilized to them to allow them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. There isn’t any certainty that Mineral Sources of any classification might be upgraded to Mineral Reserves by means of continued exploration.
The Firm’s Mineral Reserve and Mineral Useful resource figures are estimates and the Firm can present no assurances that the indicated ranges of mineral shall be produced or that the Firm will obtain the worth assumed in figuring out its Mineral Reserves. Such estimates are expressions of judgment primarily based on information, mining expertise, evaluation of drilling outcomes and business practices. Legitimate estimates made at a given time might considerably change when new info turns into out there. Whereas the Firm believes that these Mineral Reserve and Mineral Useful resource Estimates are properly established and the perfect estimates of the Firm’s administration, by their nature Mineral Reserve and Mineral Useful resource Estimates are imprecise and rely, to a sure extent, upon evaluation of drilling outcomes and statistical inferences which can finally show unreliable. If the Firm’s Mineral Reserve or Mineral Reserve Estimates are inaccurate or are decreased sooner or later, this might have an antagonistic impression on the Firm’s future money flows, earnings, outcomes or operations and monetary situation.
The Firm estimates the longer term mine lifetime of the Marathon Mission. The Firm may give no assurance that its mine life estimate shall be achieved. Failure to attain this estimate might have an antagonistic impression on the Firm’s future money flows, earnings, outcomes of operations and monetary situation.
Ahead-Wanting Info
This information launch incorporates sure forward-looking info and forward-looking statements, as outlined in relevant securities legal guidelines (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”). Ahead-looking statements mirror present expectations or beliefs concerning future occasions or the Firm’s future efficiency. All statements aside from statements of historic truth are forward-looking statements. Usually, however not all the time, forward-looking statements might be recognized by way of phrases corresponding to “plans”, “expects”, “is predicted”, “funds”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “continues”, “forecasts”, “initiatives”, “predicts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “targets” or “believes”, or variations of, or the negatives of, such phrases and phrases or state that sure actions, occasions or outcomes “might”, “might”, “would”, “ought to”, “would possibly” or “will” be taken, happen or be achieved, together with statements associated to mineral useful resource and reserve estimates; proposed mine manufacturing plans; projected mining and course of restoration charges (together with mining dilution); estimates associated to reclamation and closure prices; the timing for receipt of presidency permits, ample financing or to start building of the Marathon Mission, metallic costs and different financial assumptions (together with forex trade charges); projected capital and working prices (together with the AISC); the timing and quantity of payable metallic manufacturing and revenues; and the financial evaluation and outcomes (together with money flows, IRRs, NPVs and payback interval).
Though the Firm believes that the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are primarily based on cheap assumptions, such statements will not be ensures of future efficiency and precise outcomes or developments might differ materially from these within the statements. There are specific components that would trigger precise outcomes to vary materially from these within the forward-looking info. These embrace the timing for a building choice; the progress of improvement on the Marathon Mission, together with progress of mission expenditures and contracting processes, the Firm’s plans and expectations with respect to liquidity administration, continued availability of capital and financing, the longer term costs of palladium, copper and different commodities, allowing timelines, trade charges and forex fluctuations, will increase in prices, necessities for extra capital, and the Firm’s choices with respect to capital allocation, and the impression of COVID-19, inflation, world provide chain disruptions, world conflicts, together with the wars in Ukraine and Israel, the mission schedule for the Marathon Mission, key inputs, staffing and contractors, continued availability of capital and financing, uncertainties concerned in deciphering geological knowledge and the accuracy of Mineral Reserve and Useful resource Estimates, environmental compliance and modifications in environmental laws and regulation, the Firm’s relationships with Indigenous communities, outcomes from deliberate exploration and drilling actions, native entry situations for drilling, and normal financial, market or enterprise situations, in addition to these danger components set out within the Firm’s annual info kind for the yr ended December 31, 2023, and within the steady disclosure paperwork filed by the Firm on SEDAR+ at http://www.sedarplus.ca/.
Readers are cautioned that the foregoing record of things is just not exhaustive of the components which will have an effect on forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers mustn’t place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements on this information launch communicate solely as of the date of this information launch or as of the date or dates laid out in such statements. The Firm disclaims any intention or obligation to replace or revise any forward- wanting info, whether or not because of new info, future occasions or in any other case, aside from as required by regulation. For extra info on the Firm, buyers are inspired to overview the Firm’s public filings on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
| Footnotes: |
| 1 Except in any other case famous, the financial evaluation contains the impression of the WPM PMPA |
|
2 See Financial Evaluation, under, for metallic value and trade fee assumptions |
|
3 See Non-IFRS Monetary Measures, under, for extra info on Preliminary Capital, AISC, PdEq and CuEq. |
Contacts
For additional info please contact:
Jamie Levy
President and Chief Government Officer
(416) 640-2934 (O)
(416) 567-2440 (M)
