Trump despises wind farms so much he’s paying a French energy giant $1 billion to stop building them

TotalEnergies has decided to drop nearly $1 billion in offshore wind projects along the U.S. East Coast, redirecting the funds to natural gas initiatives primarily in Texas. This shift follows an agreement announced on March 23 with the U.S. Interior Department, which will reimburse TotalEnergies approximately $928 million for its investments in the Attentive Energy and Carolina Long Bay projects located off New York and North Carolina. These projects were previously put on hold following the election of President Donald Trump.

At the CERAWeek by S&P Global event in Houston, TotalEnergies Chairman and CEO Patrick Pouyanné expressed a preference for seeking “pragmatic solutions” rather than engaging in litigation. While the company plans to continue pursuing onshore wind, solar, and battery storage initiatives in the U.S., offshore wind has become impractical without federal subsidies.

Pouyanné emphasized the need for innovative and pragmatic investments, stating, “We can recycle this money … into smarter investments.” Meanwhile, President Trump has opposed the expansion of wind and solar energy, favoring fossil fuels and condemning large offshore wind turbines as visually unappealing.

TotalEnergies is significantly involved in the U.S. natural gas market, particularly in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. The agreement specifically mentions increased investments in projects like NextDecade’s Rio Grande LNG in Texas, as well as natural gas production in the Gulf of Mexico and U.S. shale drilling. U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum articulated support for TotalEnergies’ investment in natural gas, highlighting it as a more reliable energy source compared to intermittent wind farms.

Why this story matters: The decision reflects shifting priorities in energy investments in response to federal policy changes.

Key takeaway: TotalEnergies is pivoting from offshore wind projects to focus on U.S. natural gas, citing economic and practical considerations.

Opposing viewpoint: Critics may argue that this shift undermines efforts to expand renewable energy infrastructure and meet climate goals.

Source link

More From Author

5 Engaging Office Activities to Boost Morale

The Passive Investor’s Case For Investing in Multifamily

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *