The use of passive investment strategies in defined contribution plans has evolved significantly, driven by a variety of factors beyond mere fund selection. This trend is particularly prominent in core equity segments, where passive strategies dominate, while active management remains prevalent in fixed income and other less indexed asset classes. The adoption of passive strategies is also growing in target-date funds as these funds gain popularity.
Data from 2013 to 2023 indicates a substantial shift in fund management styles. For instance, in U.S. small blend equity, active strategies decreased from 65% to 21% over the decade. Similar trends, albeit less dramatic, are observed in other core equity categories. Conversely, areas such as high yield and core plus bonds continue to see a notable reliance on actively managed funds.
This shift in investment strategy applies to plans of all sizes. Historically, smaller plans leaned more heavily on active strategies, but recent trends show that they are now adopting passive index strategies at rates comparable to larger plans.
These insights are based on analyses conducted by the DCIIA Retirement Research Center, which highlights the evolution of defined contribution core menus and the growing presence of passive investment strategies within them.
Why this story matters
- The transition to passive strategies can affect retirement savings and investment returns for millions.
Key takeaway
- There has been a significant increase in the use of passive strategies, especially in core equity areas, with smaller plans now aligning closely with larger ones in their investment choices.
Opposing viewpoint
- Some financial experts may argue that active management can still offer advantages in specific markets, particularly in complex or volatile sectors, despite the growing trend towards passive strategies.
![How Much Do Doctors Make? [Salary by Specialty 2025]](https://webbizmarket.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/physician-compensation-chart-768x745.jpg)
