Public blockchains are increasingly gaining traction in regulated finance, with engagement from major global institutions paving the way for their practical application. Although initial timelines anticipated a prolonged development period, advancements in the integration of clearing and settlement mechanisms indicate that blockchain systems are becoming integral to the investment management sector.
Historical parallels can be drawn to the transformative impact of SWIFT in the 1970s, as blockchain technology promises to redefine the settlement processes for tokenized financial instruments. For institutional investors and risk managers, these shifts represent a significant turning point in global banking infrastructure, despite ongoing challenges to widespread adoption.
In 2025, key financial organizations are actively collaborating on production-ready blockchain solutions, moving beyond isolated pilot projects. A landmark moment occurred in November 2023, when JPMorgan and the Monetary Authority of Singapore executed the first binding interbank payment using a public blockchain, showcasing the feasibility of transparent and finalizeable settlements for regulated payments.
Singapore’s MAS is furthering this initiative through Project BLOOM, which aims to establish a scalable clearing framework for tokenized liabilities, enhancing interoperability between public and permissioned blockchains. This transition could require traditional banking and investment systems to adapt to interact with modern blockchain infrastructures.
The deterministic settlement model introduced by blockchain technology allows for simultaneous payment and receipt, potentially lowering counterparty risks and streamlining operations. An efficient cross-border capital movement can also lead to real-time financial transactions, facilitating faster settlement and reduced operational costs.
As these technologies move from pilot phases to more widespread adoption, investment professionals must prepare for hybrid environments that blend both traditional and blockchain processes, necessitating assessments of operational readiness and regulatory compliance.
Why this story matters
Key takeaway
Opposing viewpoint
