China has enacted a ban on the export of “dual-use” goods to Japan’s military, intensifying an ongoing diplomatic dispute with Tokyo. This action follows remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, who suggested in November that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan could prompt a military response from Japan. The Chinese commerce ministry stated that the ban applies globally, emphasizing that Takaichi’s comments represent a serious interference in China’s internal affairs and violate the one-China principle.
China views Taiwan as a breakaway province and has repeatedly asserted its intention to assert control over the island, leveraging military action if necessary. Takaichi’s statements, which hint at Japan’s possible military response without direct provocation, have raised concerns in Beijing, leading to demands for her comments to be retracted. The Japanese government maintains that Takaichi’s remarks do not signify a shift in policy.
The dispute has escalated in recent months, with China issuing travel warnings to its citizens concerning Japan and imposing sanctions on a former Japanese military figure who advised Taiwan. As part of the recent decree, China prohibited the export of all dual-use items that could enhance Japan’s military capabilities. While the announcement did not specify which goods were included, previous categories have featured critical minerals, advanced manufacturing equipment, and unmanned aerial vehicles.
Japanese officials, including Masaaki Kanai from the foreign ministry, denounced the measures as “absolutely unacceptable,” calling for their withdrawal. However, they do not anticipate significant repercussions from the new ban, given existing export controls.
Key points:
- Why this story matters: The ban signifies rising tensions in Sino-Japanese relations, specifically regarding Taiwan’s status.
- Key takeaway: China’s export restrictions aim to counter what it perceives as Japanese military threats.
- Opposing viewpoint: Japanese officials believe that the measures will have limited impact due to existing trade regulations.
